Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC v. Pena et al
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC |
Yesenia Garza Pena and Accent Roofing LLC |
3:2022cv00142 |
January 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jane J Boyle |
Jane J Boyle |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Accent Roofing LLC. (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Accent Roofing LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting in part #15 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Court, having already granted one extension, finds that Defendant Accent Roofing ("Accent") has not shown good cause for an additional extension of 30 days. The Court GRANTS Accent an additional 14 days. Accent's deadline to answer or file a responsive pleading is now March 22, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/8/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 15 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Accent Roofing LLC (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Yesenia Garza Pena. Waiver sent on 1/27/2022. (Cowart, Tracy) |
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Plaintiff Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group ("PCIC")'s Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. The Court GRANTS PCIC leave to proceed without local counsel. However, the Court notes that lack of local counsel may not be accepted as good cause justifying a deviation from any in-person meeting or attendance requirements the Court sets in this action. Further, if the Court later finds that lack of local counsel is impeding the proceedings, this leave to proceed without local counsel may be rescinded by subsequent Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/22/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Defendant Accent Roofing LLC ("Accent")'s Motion for Leave of the Local Counsel Requirement. The Court GRANTS Accent leave to proceed without local counsel. However, the Court notes that lack of local counsel may not be accepted as good cause justifying a deviation from any in-person meeting or attendance requirements the Court sets in this action. Further, if the Court later finds that lack of local counsel is impeding the proceedings, this leave to proceed without local counsel may be rescinded by subsequent Order. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/22/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC. (Cowart, Tracy) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC (Cowart, Tracy) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant Accent Roofing LLC's answer or responsive pleading is due on or before March 8, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/22/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Leave of Local Counsel Requirement filed by Accent Roofing LLC (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Accent Roofing LLC (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Blake Holt Crawford for Douglas P. Skelley on behalf of Accent Roofing LLC. (Crawford, Blake) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Accent Roofing LLC; served on 2/1/2022. (Cowart, Tracy) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Accent Roofing LLC. (ndt) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC. (Cowart, Tracy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number- 0539-12541801.) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Cowart, Tracy) Modified on 1/21/2022 (ndt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.