McKeller v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Darrell McKeller |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solution LLC, Trans Union LLC and Capital One Bank (USA) NA LLC |
| 3:2022cv00315 |
| February 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT: Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/8/2022) (svc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: #9 the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as to #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darrell McKeller. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 3/8/2022) (svc)
|
|
Filing 9
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should DENY McKeller's #4 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his case without prejudice unless McKeller pays the $402.00 filing fee by 3/18/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 2/17/2022) (ykp)
|
| Filing 8 Exhibits by Darrell McKeller. (McKeller, Darrell) Docket text modified on 2/16/2022 (twd). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by Darrell McKeller (McKeller, Darrell) Modified text and linkage on 2/15/2022 (axm). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darrell McKeller. (McKeller, Darrell) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darrell McKeller. (axm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darrell McKeller. (axm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Capital One Bank (USA) NA LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solution LLC, Trans Union LLC filed by Darrell McKeller. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-D, #2 Exhibit(s) E-F, #3 Exhibit(s) G-K, #4 Exhibit(s) L-N, #5 Exhibit(s) O-Q, #6 Exhibit(s) S-U, #7 Exhibit(s) U, #8 Exhibit(s) V, #9 Exhibit(s) X - Part 1, #10 Exhibit(s) X - Part 2, #11 Exhibit(s) X - Part 3, #12 Exhibit(s) X - Part 4, #13 Exhibit(s) X - Part 5, #14 Summons, #15 Return of Service Cards, #16 Cover Sheet) (axm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
