United States of America v. All Bitcoin Held by the Cryptocurrency Exchange LocalBitcoins
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: All Bitcoin Held by the Cryptocurrency Exchange LocalBitcoins in the Account of Username YipKaTsz
Case Number: 3:2022cv00542
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Forfeiture/Penalty: Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Issuance of Arrest Warrant in Rem. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/10/2022) (jmg)
March 8, 2022 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jmg)
March 8, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Issuance of Arrest Warrant in Rem filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s), #2 Exhibit(s) Attachment to Declaration - Complaint, #3 Proposed Order Order Finding Probable Cause for Arrest Warrant in Rem, #4 Proposed Order Arrest Warrant in Rem) (Elder-DOJ, Travis) Modified text on 3/8/2022 (jmg).
March 8, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States of America. (Elder-DOJ, Travis)
March 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Bitcoin Held by the Cryptocurrency Exchange LocalBitcoins in the Account of Username YipKaTsz, Owned by Ka Tsz Yip filed by United States of America. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Elder-DOJ, Travis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. All Bitcoin Held by the Cryptocurrency Exchange LocalBitcoins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Travis K Elder-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: All Bitcoin Held by the Cryptocurrency Exchange LocalBitcoins in the Account of Username YipKaTsz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?