Owl Feather-Gorbey v. USA
Plaintiff: Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 3:2022cv00566
Filed: March 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Tue Apr 26 08:00:57 CDT 2022 (crt)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: #10 Objections to Magistrate Judges [sic] Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation, and #11 Objections and Motion for Reconsideration filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey should be liberally construed as motions to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 4/25/2022) (svc)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Objection and MOTION to Reconsider Rule 59(e) filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey. (jmg)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OBJECTION filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey re: #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (mjr)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Fri Apr 1 09:51:52 CDT 2022 (crt)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this action is dismissed with prejudice as barred by the "three strikes" rule, 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/31/2022) (oyh)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Accepting #7 Findings and Recommendations. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/31/2022) (oyh)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: The plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form), received on 3/8/2022 (doc. #5 ), should be DENIED, and this case should be summarily DISMISSED as barred by the "three-strikes" rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) unless the plaintiff timely pays the filing fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/11/2022) (mcrd)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Mar 11 09:07:29 CST 2022 (crt)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,6. Thu Mar 10 10:08:05 CST 2022 (crt)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF SEVERANCE AND TRANSFER: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the petitioner's civil, non-habeas claims in the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, are SEVERED from this habeas action. The remaining habeas claims are TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of West Virginia, Beckley Division. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to: (1) open a new prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983; (2) directly assign the new action to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this habeas action; (3) file Petitioner's petition (docs. 3, 5) in that new 1983 action; and (4) file a copy of this order in both the new case and in this case. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/9/2022) (ykp)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey (ykp)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey re #3 Complaint (ykp)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against USA filed by Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Owl Feather-Gorbey v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael S Owl Feather-Gorbey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?