Strait Enterprises, LLC v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company et al
| Strait Enterprises, LLC and Strait Enterprises LLC |
| Interstate Fire & Casualty Company and Teresa Root |
| 3:2022cv00745 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brantley Starr |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: The jury trial is scheduled on this Court's two-week docket beginning 9/18/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Brantley Starr. Deadline for mediation is on or before 4/6/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 6/10/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 9/11/2023 before Judge Brantley Starr. Joinder of Parties due by 6/10/2022. Motions due by 4/20/2023. Settlement Status Report due by 4/13/2023. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/20/2022) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/9/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 8 Joint Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order by Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Teresa Root. (Sanders, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Teresa Root (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sanders, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert W Loree for Steve Thornton on behalf of Strait Enterprises LLC. (Loree, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND PROPOSAL FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER: Joint Proposal due by 5/12/2022. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 4/5/2022) (twd)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Court ORDERS both the plaintiff and the defendants to appoint local counsel, in accordance with Local Rule 83.10, or move for leave to proceed without local counsel, by 5/5/2022 (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 4/5/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Teresa Root. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Sanders, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Teresa Root, Interstate Fire & Casualty Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12717984.) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index with Exhibits, #2 Cover Sheet JS44, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement for Removed Cases) (Sanders, Thomas) (Attachment 2,3 replaced with flattened document, modified text to add filing fee information on 4/4/2022) (ykp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
