Pena v. Dallas Police Association et al
Plaintiff: Leroy Pena
Defendant: Dallas Police Association and The City of Dallas
Case Number: 3:2022cv00987
Filed: May 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Because he paid the filing fee, the plaintiff is responsible for serving each defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint, the action is subject to dismissal against that defendant without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/9/2022) (mcrd)
May 9, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon May 9 10:38:21 CDT 2022 (crt)
May 4, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed May 4 12:29:25 CDT 2022 (crt)
May 3, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dallas Police Association, The City of Dallas. (sxf)
May 3, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Leroy Pena. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (sxf)
May 3, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Leroy Pena. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number DS138020) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sxf)
May 3, 2022 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sxf)
May 3, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pena v. Dallas Police Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leroy Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dallas Police Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?