Canady v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development
| Cora Canady |
| U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and US Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| 3:2022cv01007 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #8 Motion to Remand by Plaintiff Cora Canady. (ndt)
|
|
Filing 11
Appendix in Support filed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development re #10 Response/Objection (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE filed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development re: #8 MOTION to Remand (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
Filing 9
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #8 Motion to Remand by Plaintiff Cora Canady. (mla)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Remand filed by Cora Canady (ykp)
|
|
Filing 7
Appendix in Support filed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss filed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by US Department of Housing and Urban Development (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Thu May 5 09:23:06 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Index of State Court Records, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Motion for Judicial Review of Document or Instrument Purporting to Create a Lien or Claim, #6 Proposed Order, #7 Citation, #8 Notice of Hearing, #9 Hearing Writ, #10 Return of Service, #11 Return of Service) (Stoltz-DOJ, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
