Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Costar Technologies Inc
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc |
| Costar Technologies Inc |
| 3:2022cv01009 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Chris Michael Katsantonis. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 6/13/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12877790) filed by Costar Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)Attorney Chris Michael Katsantonis added to party Costar Technologies Inc(pty:dft) (Katsantonis, Chris) |
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jennifer Librach Nall. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 6/6/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 10 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-12860375) filed by Costar Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)Attorney Jennifer Librach Nall added to party Costar Technologies Inc(pty:dft) (Nall, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Costar Technologies Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Moore, C) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Costar Technologies Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney C Michael Moore added to party Costar Technologies Inc(pty:dft) (Moore, C) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Costar Technologies Inc; served on 5/9/2022. (Johnson, Jay) |
| Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn added. Senior Judge Sam R Cummings no longer assigned to case per SO 3-340. (axm) |
| Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to [email protected]. (ygl) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Costar Technologies Inc. (ygl) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ygl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Johnson, Jay) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Johnson, Jay) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Costar Technologies, Inc. filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12802595) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Costar Technologies Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc | |
| Represented By: | Jay B Johnson |
| Represented By: | D Bradley Kizzia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Costar Technologies Inc | |
| Represented By: | C Michael Moore |
| Represented By: | Chris Michael Katsantonis |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Librach Nall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
