Gamble v. Crabtree et al
Plaintiff: Broderick Gamble
Defendant: Ronald Gary Crabtree and Robert Judson Rockett
Case Number: 3:2022cv01017
Filed: May 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. 5 Electronic Order received back from Broderick Gamble as Attempted - not known. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (mjr)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Electronic Order: Under the authority of Miscellaneous Order No. 6, this action is transferred to the Fort Worth Division, where venue is proper. All defendants are located in Fort Worth, Texas, which falls within the boundaries of the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 5/9/2022) (chmb)
May 9, 2022 Case copied to 4:22-cv-399. Transfer to Fort Worth Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (rekc)
May 6, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri May 6 11:26:10 CDT 2022 (crt)
May 5, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Broderick Gamble. (ndt)
May 5, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Ronald Gary Crabtree, Robert Judson Rockett filed by Broderick Gamble. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt)
May 5, 2022 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt)
May 5, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gamble v. Crabtree et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Broderick Gamble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Gary Crabtree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Judson Rockett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?