Marshall v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff: Latosha Marshall
Defendant: Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 3:2022cv01084
Filed: May 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Motion to Dismiss and ordering that Plaintiff must file a written response to the motion by July 27, 2022 and that Defendant may file a reply brief, but no additional documents, by August 11, 2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/7/2022.)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to respond to motion to dismiss filed by Latosha Marshall (Barron, Thomas)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 7/31/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2022. Discovery due by 12/5/2022. Deadline for mediation is on or before 12/21/2022. Motions due by 1/4/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/22/2022) (mcrd)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Proposal for contents of scheduling and discovery order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure Rule 26(F) by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Conway, Bradley)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation has filed a motion to dismiss all claims asserted by Plaintiff Latosha Marshall in her First Amended Petition. See Dkt. No. #7 . Plaintiff must file a written response to the motion by July 6, 2022. Defendant may file a reply brief, but no additional documents, by July 21, 2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/7/2022) (mcrd) Modified on 6/10/2022 (mcrd).
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Freedom Mortgage Corporation (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6), #2 Proposed Order) (Conway, Bradley)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Notice of Removal. Freedom Mortgage Corporation answer due 6/6/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/23/2022) (jmg)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Freedom Mortgage Corporation (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Petition) (Conway, Bradley)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING 26(F) REPORT: Plaintiff's counsel and Defendant's counsel must confer telephonically or in person not later than May 31, 2022. By June 21, 2022, the parties must submit a joint written Rule 26(f) report containing a proposed discovery plan. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/17/2022) (mcrd)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY AND OTHER NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/17/2022) (mcrd)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12825931) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit(s) B - State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Declaration of BC, #4 Cover Sheet) (Conway, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latosha Marshall
Represented By: Thomas C Barron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Dustin Cole George
Represented By: Bradley James Conway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?