United States of America v. $397,025 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $397,025 in U.S. Currency |
| Wayne Thomas Arcenaux and Beau Ryan Arcenaux |
| 3:2022cv01088 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brantley Starr |
| Forfeiture/Penalty: Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881 |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
AMENDED COMPLAINT against $397,025 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Elder-DOJ, Travis)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED VERIFICATION CLAIM by Beau Ryan Arcenaux. (Cook, John) Modified text on 6/23/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 11
AMENDED VERIFICATION CLAIM by Wayne Thomas Arcenaux. (Cook, John) Modified text on 6/23/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Publication by United States of America. (Elder-DOJ, Travis) Modified event text on 6/23/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Beau Ryan Arcenaux. (Cook, John) Modified event text on 6/23/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Wayne Thomas Arcenaux . (Cook, John) Modified event text on 6/23/2022 (jmg). Modified filer on 6/23/2022 (mjr).
|
|
Filing 7
Verified Claim of Beau Ryan Arcenaux by $397,025 in U.S. Currency. (Cook, John) Modified text on 6/22/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 6
Verified Claim of Wayne Thomas Arcenaux by $397,025 in U.S. Currency. (Cook, John) Modified text on 6/22/2022 (jmg).
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States of America. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Elder-DOJ, Travis)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to issue Arrest Warrant in Rem filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Elder-DOJ, Travis)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against $397,025 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Elder-DOJ, Travis)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
