Cavanna v. USA
| Fabrizia Cavanna Sarmiento |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv01097 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
OBJECTION filed by Fabrizia Cavanna Sarmiento re: #4 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: Ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this habeas action is dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 6/22/2022) (svc)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability: The court determines that the #3 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court denies Petitioners 2255 habeas motion and dismisses with prejudice this action. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 6/22/2022) (svc)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Wed Jun 22 14:14:54 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: The Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 To Vacate, Set-Aside, or Correct Illegal Sentence, received on May 17, 2022 (doc. #1 ), should be DENIED with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/20/2022) (mcrd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri May 20 15:24:17 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Wed May 18 10:05:47 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:16-cr-056-L (07)) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp)
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (ykp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cavanna v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Fabrizia Cavanna Sarmiento | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
