Nuran Inc v. City of Dallas
| Nuran Inc |
| City of Dallas |
| 3:2022cv01105 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brantley Starr |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order. Because the Court finds its likely that it will abstain from this matter pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine, the Court DENIES Nuran's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 6/9/2022) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 14
REPLY filed by Nuran Inc re: #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order (Ravji, Aamer)
|
|
Filing 13
Appendix in Support filed by City of Dallas re #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order, #12 Response/Objection (Gilbert, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE filed by City of Dallas re: #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order (Gilbert, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for the City to answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's original complaint is extended to July 18, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/24/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Original Complaint and Jury Demand filed by City of Dallas Attorney Andrew M Gilbert added to party City of Dallas(pty:dft) (Gilbert, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Court ORDERS expedited briefing on the plaintiff's #4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The defendant's response is due Thursday, May 26, 2022. The plaintiff's reply is due Monday, May 30, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 5/19/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
Appendix in Support filed by Nuran Inc re #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order Temporary Restraining Order (Ravji, Aamer)
|
|
Filing 7
Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Nuran Inc re #4 First MOTION for Injunction Temporary Restraining Order Brief in Support (Ravji, Aamer)
|
|
Filing 6
***DISREGARD ENTRY; ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE.***First MOTION for Injunction Appendix in Support of Brief in Support of Injunction filed by Nuran Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Ravji, Aamer) Modified on 5/19/2022 (svc).
|
|
Filing 5
***DISREGARD ENTRY; ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE.***First MOTION for Injunction Brief in Support filed by Nuran Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Ravji, Aamer) Modified on 5/19/2022 (svc).
|
|
Filing 4
First MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunctive Relief filed by Nuran Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Brief In Support of TRO) (Ravji, Aamer). Added MOTION for Preliminary Injunctive Relief on 5/19/2022 (twd).
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to City of Dallas. (ndt)
|
|
Filing 2
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Nuran, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12832685) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Ravji, Aamer)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nuran Inc v. City of Dallas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nuran Inc | |
| Represented By: | Aamer Ravji |
| Represented By: | Jack GB Ternan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Dallas | |
| Represented By: | Andrew M Gilbert |
| Represented By: | Emily K Worland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
