Wright v. Campbell et al
| Don Ameche wright |
| Henry L campbell and Robin Davis |
| 3:2022cv01106 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Supplemental Document by Henry L Campbell, Robin Davis as to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Returns of Service) (Noga, Darrell) |
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff must address the following deficiency: A review of the docket reveals that Plaintiff has not yet registered as a user of the Court's electronic filing system, as required. In the event Plaintiff has not already done so, he is ORDERED to register for electronic filing through this Court's CM/ECF system, as required by Northern District of Texas Local Civil Rule 5.1(f), by June 16, 2022. Instructions for registering are found online at https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/AttorneyReg/. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/25/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Tue May 24 12:41:26 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Tue May 24 12:41:06 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu May 19 09:54:08 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mjr) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Henry L Campbell, Robin Davis. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (See document #1 for image.) (mjr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Robin Davis, Henry L campbell. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12833424) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-State court pleadings, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement, #4 Additional Page(s) Certificate of Interested Parties) (Noga, Darrell) (Attachment 2 replaced to flatten on 5/19/2022) (mjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
