Clough v. Arrow-Magnolia International Inc
Plaintiff: Tona Clough
Defendant: Arrow-Magnolia International Inc
Case Number: 3:2022cv01147
Filed: May 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam R Cummings
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court, having considered Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Complaint and Remand to Arbitration, filed June 24,2022, is of the opinion that the same should be GRANTED. Accordingly, this civil action is hereby STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED in favor of arbitration. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 6/27/2022) (ndt)
June 27, 2022 Civil Case Administratively Closed per #7 Order. (ndt)
June 24, 2022 Filing 6 Agreed MOTION to Withdraw and Remand to Arbitration filed by Tona Clough (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order withdraw and remand to arbitration) (O'Kelly, Nicholas)
June 3, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Arrow-Magnolia International Inc; served on 5/31/2022. (jmg)
May 25, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Arrow-Magnolia International Inc. (sxf)
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf)
May 25, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tona Clough. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (O'Kelly, Nicholas)
May 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Arrow-Magnolia International Inc. filed by Tona Clough. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12849304) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (O'Kelly, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clough v. Arrow-Magnolia International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tona Clough
Represented By: Nicholas A O'Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arrow-Magnolia International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?