Sullivan v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department et al
| Dustin Sullivan |
| Dallas County Sheriff's Department, NFN Moffit, NFN Nicholson, NFN Garcia, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 3:2022cv01162 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PLRA FILING FEE ORDER: Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. And the agency having custody of him shall forward to the Court, when funds exist in his inmate trust account or institutional equivalent, an initial partial filing fee of $6.00. Plaintiff shall pay $344.00, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/6/2022) (ndt)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Also mailed to inmate accounting office Wed Jul 6 10:36:30 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dustin Sullivan (ykp) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY REGARDING IFP MOTION: Dustin Sullivan must address the following deficiency: Failure to either pay the full filing fee or file a proper IFP motion supported bya completed and verified CTA. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 7/1/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/31/2022) (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (oyh) Modified on 6/10/2022 (mcrd).
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue May 31 09:03:46 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue May 31 14:16:08 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dustin Sullivan. (sxf) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dustin Sullivan. (sxf) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe, NFN Garcia, NFN Moffit, NFN Nicholson filed by Dustin Sullivan. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sxf) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sxf) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri May 27 15:29:00 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
