Perez v. Union Stewards UAW Bombardier
Olivia Perez and Olivia D Perez |
Union Stewards UAW Bombardier |
3:2022cv01178 |
May 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Renee Harris Toliver |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Olivia D Perez. (See document #7 for image) (oyh) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT Olivia Perez against Union Stewards UAW Bombardier filed by Olivia D Perez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Form AO 239 pg1, #2 Additional Page(s) Form AO 239 pg2, #3 Additional Page(s) Form AO 239 pg3, #4 Additional Page(s) Form AO 239 pg4, #5 Additional Page(s) Form AO 239 pg5) (Perez, Olivia) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Jun 6 08:44:52 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Olivia Perez must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) file an amended complaint on the form complaint for use in employment discrimination cases (Pro Se 7) and specifically state her legal claims in compliance with Rule 8(a), (2) pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 Form with complete explanations, and (3) register to use the Courts electronic filing system, all by 6/25/2022. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 6/25/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 6/3/2022) (ygl) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Jun 1 08:33:17 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Olivia Perez. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (sxf) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Olivia Perez. (sxf) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Union Stewards UAW Bombardier filed by Olivia Perez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sxf) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sxf) |
Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.