Segovia v. Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd
| Rafael Segovia |
| Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd |
| 3:2022cv01246 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Brantley Starr |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint filed by Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Johnson, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd ; served on 6/29/2022. (sxf) |
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Court ORDERS the defendant to appoint local counsel, in accordance with Local Rule 83.10, or to file a motion to proceed without local counsel by August 11, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/12/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The defendant's answer or other responsive pleading is due August 4, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/12/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd. Attorney Samuel Johnson added to party Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd(pty:dft) (Johnson, Samuel) Modified text on 7/6/2022 (ygl). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd; served on 6/1/2022. (Sturgill, K) Modified event text on 6/14/2022 (jmg). |
| Filing 6 Business Reply Card signed by USMS; re #1 Complaint, #4 Summons, #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed on 6/9/2022. (mla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd. (mla) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS, TERMINATING REFERRAL AND ORDERING SERVICE OF PROCESS: The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff's counsel and issue summons for the named defendant and deliver the summons and a copy of the complaint to the United States Marshal's Service. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/9/2022) (mla) Modified on 6/10/2022 (frw).
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (sxf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd filed by Rafael Segovia. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet CCA, #2 Exhibit(s) CIP, #3 Exhibit(s) IFP, #4 Exhibit(s) SUMMONS) (Sapp, Matthew) (Attachment 1 and 3-4 replaced on 6/8/2022 to flatten image) (sxf). |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rafael Segovia. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF)(see document #1 for image). (sxf) |
| MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rafael Segovia (see document #1 for image). (sxf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Segovia v. Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rafael Segovia | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Brantley Sapp |
| Represented By: | K Michael Sturgill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Messina Hooper Family Enterprises Ltd | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Johnson |
| Represented By: | Brandy Nicole Hoge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
