Dingler v. Rockwall County Court #2 et al
| Joseph Kelly Dingler |
| Rockwall County Court #2 and Travis County Court #5 |
| 3:2022cv01252 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Mail returned as undeliverable. #5 Findings and Recommendations on Case. received back from Joseph Kelly Dingler as Return to Sender. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (oyh)
|
|
Filing 13
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the "Motion to Correct the Record and Properly Rule on the Motion for Return of Seizure of Property", filed on 7/24/2022 (doc. #12 ), is liberally construed as a motion for reconsideration and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/25/2022) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 12
Motion to Correct the Record and Properly Rule on the Motion for Return of Seizure of Property filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. (Dingler, Joseph) Modified text on 7/25/2022 (mjr).
|
|
Filing 11
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Joseph Kelly Dingler must address the following deficiency: The petitioner did not file his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, The petition also mentions claims that may arise under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the petitioner has also not paid the $5 filing fee for a habeas case, or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/22/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP, #2 Additional Page(s) Amended 2241, #3 Additional Page(s) 1983) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The petitioner contends that he did not receive the Notice of Deficiency and Order dated 6/10/2022 (doc. #3 .) (See doc. #9 .) In order to provide him another opportunity to comply with the order, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. A second Notice of Deficiency and Order will be issued contemporaneously with this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/22/2022) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION TO EXCUSE RESPONSE AND OBJECTION filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler re: #5 Findings and Recommendations. (Dingler, Joseph) Modified text on 7/22/2022 (ygl).
|
|
Filing 8
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, by Petitioner Joseph Kelly Dingler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s)) (Dingler, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is the "Motion for the Immediate Return of Illegally Seized Property", filed on July 19, 2022 (doc. #6 ). Because he appears to seek to file a civil action, the Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to open a new civil action under 42 U.S.C. 1983, file the petitioner's motion (doc. 6) in that case, and terminate it in this habeas action. (new civil action 3:22-cv-1588) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/20/2022) (ndt) Modified text on 7/22/2022 (ndt).
|
|
Filing 6
Motion for the Immediate Return of Illegally Seized Property filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. (Dingler, Joseph) (Main Document 6 replaced with correct PDF on 7/20/2022) (rekc).
|
|
Filing 5
***Vacated per #10 Order*** Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the case should be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/18/2022) (mcrd) Modified on 7/22/2022 (mcrd).
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Jul 18 12:28:04 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Change in Clerk Notice filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 3
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Joseph Kelly Dingler must address the following deficiency: The petitioner did not file his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 on the appropriate form for that type of action. The petitioner has also not paid the $5 filing fee for a habeas case, or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/10/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP, #2 Additional Page(s) 1983 Amended, #3 Additional Page(s) 2241) (ndt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Fri Jun 10 12:46:27 CDT 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Kelly Dingler. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mms)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (mms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
