Zelus Group LLC et al v. Amaru Entertainment Inc
| Zelus Group, LLC, Ronald Brent and Zelus Group LLC |
| Amaru Entertainment, Inc. and Amaru Entertainment Inc |
| 3:2022cv01281 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Amaru's Response to the Court's July 20, 2022 Order re: #8 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, filed by Amaru Entertainment Inc (Joyner, Samuel) Modified text on 7/27/2022 (ykp).
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amaru Entertainment Inc. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Joyner, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 10
Appendix in Support filed by Amaru Entertainment Inc re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Joyner, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Amaru Entertainment Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Samuel E Joyner added to party Amaru Entertainment Inc(pty:dft) (Joyner, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 8
Order to Show Cause: The Court ORDERS the following: By Wednesday 7/27/2022. Defendant must SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why it has failed to file an answer. Failure to comply with this Order may result in default judgment against Defendant without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/20/2022) (ykp)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Amaru Entertainment Inc, served on 6/15/2022. (ygl)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Amaru Entertainment Inc. (mjr)
|
|
Filing 5
Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Ronald Brent, Zelus Group LLC. (Cruciani, Gary)
|
|
Filing 4
Report to Copyright Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 121 e-mailed to 508filings@loc.gov. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ronald Brent, Zelus Group, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Young, Carson)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Zelus Group, LLC, Ronald Brent filed by Zelus Group, LLC, Ronald Brent. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12891865) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet) (Young, Carson) (Attachment 2 replaced on 6/14/2022) (sxf).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
