Fellows v. Gilley et al
Plaintiff: James Fellows
Defendant: Smith Gilley, Celeste Police Department, Perry Sandlin, Jack Deviney, FNU Colvin Groqen and Greenville Bail Bonds
Case Number: 3:2022cv01508
Filed: July 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Assault, Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss Fellows's case without prejudice under Rule 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 8/16/2022) (axm)
August 16, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Aug 16 17:24:36 CDT 2022 (crt)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: James Fellows must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The $402 fee has not been paid nor has a proper request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted. A request to proceed in forma pauperis must include a financial affidavit. See 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(1). The affidavit in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is almost entirely incomplete. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 8/15/2022. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 7/14/2022) (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, #3 Pro Se 1 Complaint) (ygl)
July 14, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Jul 14 11:39:51 CDT 2022 (crt)
July 13, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by James Fellows. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mlb)
July 13, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Fellows. (mlb)
July 13, 2022 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Celeste Police Department, Jack Deviney, Smith Gilley, Greenville Bail Bonds, FNU Colvin Groqen, Perry Sandlin filed by James Fellows. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mlb)
July 13, 2022 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mlb)
July 13, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)
July 13, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Jul 13 11:38:44 CDT 2022 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fellows v. Gilley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Fellows
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith Gilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Celeste Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perry Sandlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Deviney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Colvin Groqen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greenville Bail Bonds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?