Zapata v. Landstar Inway Inc et al
| Wendy Monroy Zapata |
| Landstar Inway, Inc., Duval Semi Trailers, Edwin Holland, Landstar Inway Inc and Edwin Holland, II |
| 3:2022cv01608 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Wendy Monroy Zapata (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Certified Crash Report) (Kelso, Rhiannon) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Duval Semi Trailers. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Duval Semi Trailers. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Duval Semi Trailers. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Clinton V Cox, IV added to party Duval Semi Trailers(pty:dft) (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Landstar Inway Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Landstar Inway Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Cox, Clinton) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Landstar Inway, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-12983363) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s)) (Cox, Clinton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
