Taylor v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
| Renice Taylor |
| Sunbeam Products Inc |
| 3:2022cv01650 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial beginning 9/18/2023 before Judge Jane J Boyle. Joinder of Parties due by 10/14/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 10/14/2022. Motions due by 6/19/2023. Discovery due by 5/19/2023. Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/1/2023. Pretrial Order due by 9/4/2023. Pretrial Materials due by 9/4/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 9/8/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Jane J Boyle. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/21/2022) (svc)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Renice Taylor. (Kress, Adam) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:15. Mon Sep 12 09:41:46 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: The Court's records indicate that Defendants Attorney Donald R. Ross is not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas as required by Local Rule 83.10(a). Therefore, to serve as local counsel, on or before Tuesday, September 20, 2022, Mr. Ross must become admitted to practice in this District. See N.D. Tex. Loc. Civ. R. 83.7. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/8/2022) (svc)
|
|
Filing 14
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 9/20/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/30/2022) (svc)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sunbeam Products Inc. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Akin, Kyle) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Sunbeam Products Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Kyle Randall Akin added to party Sunbeam Products Inc(pty:dft) (Akin, Kyle) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Renice Taylor re: #9 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer. (Kress, Adam) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Renice Taylor. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Kress, Adam) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to comply with the Local Rule on or before Monday, August 29, 2022, or SHOW CAUSE, in writing, for her failure to do so. On or before Friday, September 16, 2022, Mr. Barbe must either become admitted to practice in this District (see LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (see LR 83.9(b)). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/25/2022) (svc)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sunbeam Products Inc; served on 8/8/2022. (Kress, Adam) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Adam J. Kress. Unless already done, applicant must register as an ECF user within 14 days. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/9/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing (Clerk Note: Filer states no fee is to be collected due to prior payment or waiver by MO 16 or prior order.) filed by Renice Taylor (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Kress, Adam) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Adam J. Kress. Applicant has not attached an original certificate of good standing issued within the past 90 days from the attorney licensing authority in a state in which applicant is admitted to practice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/4/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $100; Receipt number 0539-13010146) filed by Renice Taylor Attorney Adam John Kress added to party Renice Taylor(pty:pla) (Kress, Adam) (Main Document 4 replaced/flattened PDF on 8/5/2022) (ygl). Modified text on 8/5/2022 (ygl). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sunbeam Products Inc. (mjr) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mjr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Sunbeam Products, Inc. filed by Renice Taylor. (Filing Fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12997352.) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Owners Manual, #2 Exhibit(s) Recall Notice) (Clark, Collen) Modified filing fee information on 7/29/2022 (mjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
