Padilla v. The State of Texas
Petitioner: Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent: The State of Texas
Case Number: 3:2022cv01695
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that The petitioner is denied leave to proceed with this attempted challenge to his convictions for aggravated robbery and rape in Cause Nos. F83-88766-UP and F82-90756-RP in Dallas County, Texas, on 5/3/983, and to the prior imposition of sanctions against him. (Ordered by District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 9/19/2022) (oyh)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ACCEPTING #6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, this administratively closed case shall be RE-OPENED. The petitioner's "Motion of Request to Obtain Leave of Court and to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Injunctive Relief and Notify the Court Sanctions are Not Owed to US. Dist. Court or 5th Cir. Ct. Of Appeals", received 8/19/2022 (doc. #5 ), is DENIED, and by separate judgment, the case will be DISMISSED. (Ordered by District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 9/19/2022) (oyh)
September 19, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Mon Sep 19 16:54:17 CDT 2022 (crt)
August 24, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Wed Aug 24 07:58:56 CDT 2022 (crt)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on relevant filings and applicable law, this administratively closed case should be REOPENED, the petitioner's "Motion of Request to Obtain Leave of Court and to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Injunctive Relief and Notify the Court Sanctions are Not Owed to U.S. Dist. Court or 5th Cir. Ct. Of Appeals", received 8/19/2022 (doc. #5 ), should be DENIED, and the case should be DISMISSED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/23/2022) (mcrd)
August 19, 2022 Filing 5 Motion of Request to Obtain Leave of Court to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, in Injunctive Relief and Notify the Court Sanctions filed by Ismael Hernandez Padilla. (sxf)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerks Office shall file a copy of the Fifth Circuits sanction order in this habeas case and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE it for failure to comply with its terms. Any pending and future motions in this action shall be docketed for administrative purposes only and terminated. No action will be taken on those filings while this action remains closed pursuant to the Fifth Circuits sanctions order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/5/2022) (Attachments: #1 USCA5 Sanction Order) (svc) Modified text on 8/22/2022 (axm).
August 5, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Aug 5 15:28:54 CDT 2022 (crt)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The plaintiff's post-judgment motion in this case is construed as a new habeas action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to: (1) unfile or terminate the motion in this case; (2) open a new habeas case under 28 U.S.C. 2254; (3) directly assign the new habeas case to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this case; (4) file the motion as a habeas petition in that newhabeas case; and (5) file a copy of this order in that new habeas case. (Originally filed in case 3:18-cv-549 as document 7.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/4/2022) (mjr)
August 4, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) (mjr)
December 23, 2021 Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (MOTION to Enhance Lawsuit and Request Granting of Injunctive Relief) filed by Ismael Hernandez Padilla. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed in case 3:18-cv-549 as document 6.) (mjr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padilla v. The State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?