Breshell v. Lynn et al
| Courtney Breshell |
| Barbara M. G. Lynn, Brantley Starr, David L Horan, Chad E Meachum, Fabio Leonardi, Karen Mitchell, Jason Hawkins and Adam King |
| 3:2022cv01733 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. NEF of Fri Aug 26 11:15:48 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC Order and Notice of Deficiency: Plaintiff Courtney Breshell must address the following deficiencies: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis does not provide enough information to determine whether Plaintiff should be granted in forma pauperis status. Specifically, Plaintiff failed to respond to any of the inquiries on the motion. Further a review of the docket sheet reveals that Plaintiff has not yet registered as a user of the Court's electronic filing system, as required. Instructions for registering are found online at http://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/AttorneyReg/. Therefore by September 21, 2022 Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) either pay the full $402.00 filing fee or fully respond to every inquiry in the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the AO 239 Form and to submit it to the Court, and (2) register to use the Court's electronic filing system. PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). A motion to proceed in forma pauperis (AO 239 Form) is available online at http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/AO239_0.pdf (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 8/25/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 Counterclaim and Notice of Objections to the United States District Court's Jurisdiction filed by Courtney Breshell. (sxf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Aug 11 19:27:48 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Courtney Breshell. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (axm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Courtney Breshell. (axm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Jason Hawkins, David L Horan, Adam King, Fabio Leonardi, Barbara M. G. Lynn, Chad E Meachum, Karen Mitchell, Brantley Starr filed by Courtney Breshell. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) Modified filed date on 8/11/2022 (axm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
