Cobb v. Kendall
Plaintiff: Wanda L Cobb
Defendant: Frank Kendall
Case Number: 3:2022cv01867
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Summons reissued as to Frank Kendall, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ykp)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER: The plaintiff's proof of service appears to show that she attempted to have the defendant served by the Secretary of State for the State of Texas. Her attempted service is still not valid under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff is hereby placed on notice that she has not filed proof of service on the federal defendant. If she does not file a valid return of service or otherwise show that the federal defendant was properly served within 90 days of the date that she filed this lawsuit, it may be dismissed under Rule 4(m). The Clerk of the Court shall again send summons forms and a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 to the plaintiff. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/19/2022) (Attachments: #1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, #2 Summons) (ykp)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Proof of Service by Secretary of State. (sxf)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 RESPONSE filed by Wanda L Cobb re: #23 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (ygl)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: #18 Findings and Recommendations on #16 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Wanda L Cobb. The pro se #16 plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Cost is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/12/2022) (svc)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE re: copy of process received by Secretary of State of the State of Texas filed by Service of Process. (oyh)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Summons re-issued as to Frank Kendall, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying #21 Motion to Waive Service. The Clerk of the Court shall send summons forms and a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 to the plaintiff. If the plaintiff does not file a valid return of service or otherwise show that the defendant was properly served under Rule 4(i) within 90 days of the filing of this lawsuit, it may be dismissed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/28/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) LR 4, #2 Additional Page(s) Summons) (ndt)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the plaintiff's #20 Motion to Reconsider Legal Counsel, filed 9/27/2022, is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/28/2022) (mcrd)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MOTION to Waive Service filed by Wanda L Cobb. (axm)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MOTION to Reconsider Legal Counsel filed by Wanda L Cobb. (axm)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Summons Reissued as to Frank Kendall. (ygl)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant findings, evidence, and applicable law, the pro se plaintiff's #16 Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Cost, filed 9/22/2022, should be DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/23/2022) (mcrd)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: #15 Proof of Service. The plaintiff is hereby placed on notice that he has not filed proof of service on the defendant under either state or federal law, or a waiver of service by the defendant. If the plaintiff does not file a valid return of service or otherwise show that the defendant was properly served within 90 days of the date that he filed this lawsuit, it may be dismissed under Rule 4(m). The Clerk of the Court shall again send summons forms and a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 to the plaintiff. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/23/2022) (Attachments: #1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4) (ygl)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Wanda L Cobb (Cobb, Wanda)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Proof of Service on Frank Kendall. (axm)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Frank Kendall filed by Wanda L Cobb. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mla)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Frank Kendall filed by Wanda L Cobb. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sxf)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Although she has provided a certificate of service for her motion to appoint counsel, the plaintiff has still not filed proof of service of this lawsuit on the federal defendant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). If the plaintiff does not file a valid return of service or otherwise show that a defendant was properly served under Rule 4(i) within 90 days of the filing of this lawsuit, it may be dismissed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/7/2022) (mcrd)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wanda L Cobb re #6 First MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (sxf)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Wanda L Cobb (Cobb, Wanda)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying the plaintiff's #6 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/31/2022) (mcrd)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Because she paid the filing fee, the plaintiff is responsible for serving each defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint, the action is subject to dismissal against that defendant without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/31/2022) (mcrd)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER OF REFERENCE: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), this case is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Irma Carillo Ramirez for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 8/29/2022) (svc)
August 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 First MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Wanda L Cobb (Cobb, Wanda)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons issued as to Frank Kendall, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (mms)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wanda L Cobb. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mms)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mms)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Frank Kendall filed by Wanda L Cobb. (Filing fee $402.00; Receipt number 300000775) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mms)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. 1,3 Tue Aug 23 15:55:37 CDT 2022 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cobb v. Kendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda L Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Kendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?