Arceneaux Jr, et al v. Does, et al
| Jr. Scott Arceneaux, Aristos Petros, G59 Merchandising, Scott Arceneaux, Jr and G59 Merchandising LLC |
| John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Companies |
| 3:2022cv01876 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Jane Does, John Does, XYZ Companies. (mla) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Summons of Complaint filed by Scott Arceneaux, Jr. (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mms) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Sam A. Lindsay. Senior Judge A. Joe Fish no longer assigned to the case per SO 3. (axm) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
| Filing 3 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Scott Arceneaux, G59 Merchandising, Aristos Petros re #1 Complaint, Memorandum of Law In Support of Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s), #2 Affidavit(s), #3 Affidavit(s), #4 Proposed Order) (Nikolopoulos, Andy) Modified on 8/24/2022 (mms). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Scott Arceneaux, G59 Merchandising, Aristos Petros. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Nikolopoulos, Andy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against John Does, Jane Does, XYZ Companies filed by Scott Arceneaux, Aristos Petros, G59 Merchandising. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-13058444) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Nikolopoulos, Andy) (Attachment 1 replaced to flatten pdf on 8/24/2022) (mms). Modified on 8/24/2022 (mms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
