Obasaju v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Laju Obasaju |
| Equifax Information Services LLC and First Entertainment Credit Union |
| 3:2022cv01893 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Central District of California as case number 2:22-cv-6839. (axm) |
Filing 10
ORDER: #9 Unopposed MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Laju Obasaju is Granted. Case transferred to Western Division of Central District of California. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/20/2022) (svc)
|
| Interdistrict Transfer to Central District of California; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Central District of California. (svc) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Transfer Case out of District/Division filed by Laju Obasaju (Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Defendant Equifax filed by Laju Obasaju (Bellinder, Thomas) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Motion to Extend Time to File Response. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant First Entertainment Credit Union's Motion to Dismiss is due on or before September 26, 2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/13/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Laju Obasaju (Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by First Entertainment Credit Union re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (McCown, James) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by First Entertainment Credit Union (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McCown, James) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
| Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant First Entertainment Credit Union. (McCown, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by First Entertainment Credit Union. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-13066977) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (McCown, James) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by First Entertainment Credit Union. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (See document #1 for image) (axm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
