Creekview IP LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc
Plaintiff: Creekview IP LLC
Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker Inc
Case Number: 3:2022cv01948
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 Filing 22 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Final Order. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (ygl) (Main Document 22 replaced on 10/28/2022) (chmb).
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Per the #20 Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement, the Court ORDERS the following: (1) All deadlines in this case are STAYED. (2) The parties are ORDERED to file any joint stipulation of dismissal or agreed final judgment ON OR BEFORE November 28, 2022. (3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case pending filing of any stipulation of dismissal. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/26/2022) (chmb)
October 26, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per 21 Electronic Order. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (ygl)
October 25, 2022 Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Stay All Deadlines & Notice of Settlement filed by Creekview IP LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mort, Raymond)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 11/2/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/12/2022) (svc)
October 6, 2022 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stanley Black & Decker Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Backofen, Mark)
October 6, 2022 Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Stanley Black & Decker Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Stanley Black & Decker Inc (Backofen, Mark)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Parties have failed to articulate good cause for a continued extension. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/6/2022) (chmb)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jimmy Chong. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/6/2022) (chmb)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/6/2022) (chmb)
October 5, 2022 Filing 13 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Creekview IP LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mort, Raymond)
October 5, 2022 Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Jimmy Chong (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13203908) filed by Creekview IP LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Mort, Raymond)
October 5, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Creekview IP LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mort, Raymond)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: By Monday, October 10, 2022, Chong must either become admitted to practice in this District (see LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (see LR 83.9(b)); By Friday, October 14, 2022, Plaintiff must either file a notice designating local counsel or SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why local counsel has not yet appeared on its behalf. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/3/2022) (svc)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant Stanley Black & Decker Inc.'s answer is now due 10/6/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/23/2022) (chmb)
September 22, 2022 Filing 8 First Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Stanley Black & Decker Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Mark R Backofen added to party Stanley Black & Decker Inc(pty:dft) (Backofen, Mark)
September 2, 2022 Filing 7 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mlb)
September 1, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Stanley Black & Decker Inc. (mlb)
September 1, 2022 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Creekview IP LLC. (Mort, Raymond)
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing of Patent/Trademark Case (Form AO120) filed by Creekview IP LLC (Mort, Raymond)
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Creekview IP LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Mort, Raymond)
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. filed by Creekview IP LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-13084754) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, #3 Exhibit(s) 2) (Mort, Raymond)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Creekview IP LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Creekview IP LLC
Represented By: Raymond W Mort, III
Represented By: Jimmy Chong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker Inc
Represented By: Mark R Backofen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?