SRP Environmental LLC v. Claremont Property Co
SRP Environmental LLC |
Claremont Property Co |
3:2022cv02075 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by SRP Environmental LLC (Smith, Joslyn) |
Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal. (chmb) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Claremont Property Co. (axm) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm) |
Filing 2 ORDER: "Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree." Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (internal citations omitted); see 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1332(a)(1)-(2). The Court orders Plaintiff to amend its Complaint to properly allege both its and Defendant's citizenship by September 23, 2022. Further, each party's Certificate of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement must also properly reflect the citizenship of each party. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the case without prejudice and without further notice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/19/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Claremont Property Co filed by SRP Environmental, LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number BTXNDC-13156124) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Smith, Joslyn) Modified party on 9/19/2022 (axm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SRP Environmental LLC v. Claremont Property Co | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SRP Environmental LLC | |
Represented By: | Joslyn Roxann Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Claremont Property Co | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.