Odom v. 439th Judicial District Court et al
Petitioner: Michael Odom
Respondent: 439th Judicial District Court, Rockwall County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners, J Jams, D Rakow, FNU Garrett, FNU Calkins and FNU Lloyd
Case Number: 3:2022cv02098
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Filing 21 OBJECTION to #15 Findings and Recommendations by Michael Odom. (ygl)
October 31, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:20. Mon Oct 31 09:14:12 CDT 2022 (crt)
October 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying as moot #18 Motion for extension time to pay the filing fee. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/29/2022) (Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez)
October 27, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time for Filing Fee filed by Michael Odom. (sxf)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the petitioner's #16 Motion for the Appointment of Council [sic], received 10/25/2022, is DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/27/2022) (mcrd)
October 27, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:17. Thu Oct 27 15:46:12 CDT 2022 (crt)
October 25, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION to the Appointment of Counsel filed by Michael Odom. (sxf)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, received on 8/29/2022, should be DISMISSED, and the #9 (Emergency) Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, received on 10/4/2022, should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/25/2022) (mcrd)
October 25, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:15. Tue Oct 25 20:03:01 CDT 2022 (crt)
October 20, 2022 Filing 14 Status Request by Michael Odom with Deputy Clerk Response. (sxf)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re: the petitioner's #11 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The petitioner's filing fee was received on 10/18/2022. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is therefore DEEMED MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/20/2022) (mcrd)
October 20, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:13. Thu Oct 20 13:04:08 CDT 2022 (crt)
October 17, 2022 Filing 19 Status Request by Michael Odom with Deputy Clerk Response. (mms)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The petitioner is granted THIRTY days from the date of this order to pay the required $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/7/2022) (svc)
October 7, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Fri Oct 7 11:33:37 CDT 2022 (crt)
October 6, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Michael Odom. (ndt)
October 4, 2022 Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Michael Odom re #9 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. (ygl)
October 4, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael Odom. (ygl)
September 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order and Notice of Deficiency: Michael Odom must address the following deficiency: You have not paid the $5 filing fee for a habeas case under 2241, or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/26/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP, #2 Additional Page(s) 1983) (ndt)
September 26, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Sep 26 09:45:34 CDT 2022 (crt)
September 22, 2022 Filing 5 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 6:22-cv-00344. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.
September 22, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Sep 22 14:43:26 CDT 2022 (crt)
September 22, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Thu Sep 22 10:03:08 CDT 2022 (crt)
September 21, 2022 Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mms)
September 21, 2022 Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER. The above-styled application for the writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED, forthwith and without delay, to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, for such other and further proceedings as that Court deems appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/21/2022. (wea, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 9/22/2022.]
September 21, 2022 Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. (wea, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 9/22/2022.]
August 29, 2022 Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell (jbe, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 9/22/2022.]
August 29, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Odom.(jbe, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 9/22/2022.]
August 29, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge.Consent mailed to Petitioner. (jbe, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 9/22/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Odom v. 439th Judicial District Court et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Odom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: 439th Judicial District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rockwall County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Southern Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J Jams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D Rakow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU Calkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?