Mahone et al v. Root Insurance Company et al
| Marquita Mahone and Erica Humphrey |
| Root Insurance Company, Kyle Robert Love and Kwyncie Purtee |
| 3:2022cv02319 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order: The Court, having considered the Parties' Notice of Settlement indicating that they have reached a settlement, finds that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED without prejudice to its being reopened to enter an order of dismissal or to enter other orders if the settlement is not consummated. Counsel in this case are ORDERED to file appropriate dismissal papers on or before 30 days from the date of this Order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/12/2022) (ndt)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Root Insurance Company (Thompson, Rhonda) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by Root Insurance Company re: #5 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Gardner, Brett) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand filed by Marquita Mahone (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Clay, Brennan) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Root Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Thompson, Rhonda) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 2/15/2023. Deadline for mediation is on or before 10/16/2023. Discovery due by 4/15/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 2/15/2023. Motions due by 10/16/2023. Trial set for 5/6/2024 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Sam R Cummings. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/24/2022) (sxf)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Root Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13229766) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) Supp Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) Index of State Court Docs, #4 Exhibit(s) State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit(s) Original Petition, #6 Exhibit(s) Citation - Root, #7 Exhibit(s) Citation - Love, #8 Exhibit(s) Citation - Purtee, #9 Exhibit(s) Return of Service - Love, #10 Exhibit(s) Return of Service - Root, #11 Exhibit(s) Root, Love & Purtee's Original Answer) (Thompson, Rhonda) (Attachment 2 replaced to flatten pdf on 10/17/2022) (mms). Modified text on 10/17/2022 (mms). Modified text on 10/24/2022 (sxf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
