Almo Investments Ltd et al v. Kaufman County et al
| Almo Investments Ltd and Mohammad Tatari |
| Kaufman County and Cecil Wayne McKenzie |
| 3:2022cv02371 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #16 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' response due by 12/23/2022. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 12/21/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Magistrate Judge David L. Horan assigned to this case pursuant to Special Order 3-346 for matters that may be referred. (cea)
|
|
Filing 16
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Almo Investments Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Alvarez, Elizabeth) Modified text on 12/8/2022 (sxf).
|
|
Filing 15
***DISREGARD - PLEASE SEE DOCUMENT #16 *** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Almo Investments Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Alvarez, Elizabeth) Modified text on 12/7/2022 (rekc).
|
|
Filing 14
***DISREGARD - PLEASE SEE DOCUMENT #16 *** MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Almo Investments Ltd (Alvarez, Elizabeth) Modified on 12/7/2022 (rekc).
|
|
Filing 13
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Kaufman County, Cecil Wayne McKenzie with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Weiland, S)
|
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Original Petition is 12/2/2022. (Ordered by District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 11/4/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 11
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Kaufman County, Cecil Wayne McKenzie (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Weiland, S)
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, and denying #9 MOTION to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order. The state-court Temporary Restraining Order will be permitted to expire at 5:25 p.m. today and will not be extended. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/27/2022) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dissolve Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Temporary Restraining Order, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Complaint Forms, #3 Exhibit(s) C- Affidavit in Support of Motion to Dissolve, #4 Proposed Order) (Weiland, S) Modified text on 10/28/2022 (sxf).
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Letter to Judges Fitzwater and Lynn filed by Almo Investments Ltd (Alvarez, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Status Report due by 10/26/2022 at noon re agreed TRO extension; Response to TRO extension, if agreement cannot be reached, due by 10/27/2022 at noon. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 10/24/2022) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing 6
Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge Sam R Cummings recused Per SO 3-342. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:22-cv-2371-M. (cea)
|
|
Filing 5
Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge A. Joe Fish recused per SO 3-342. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Senior Judge Sam R Cummings for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:22-cv-2371-C. (cea)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Injunction filed by Almo Investments Ltd, Mohammad Tatari. See Document #1 for image. (cea)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kaufman County, Cecil Wayne McKenzie. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Weiland, S)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Kaufman County, Cecil Wayne McKenzie. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13244373) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Index of State Court File, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Weiland, S)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
