Williams v. Dallas County et al
Plaintiff: Chauncil-Danielle Williams
Defendant: Dallas County, Mesquite Office, Garland Office, Vince Griffin, Bill Gipson and Ben Adamcik
Case Number: 3:2022cv02388
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 12/2/2022) (sxf)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #9 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 12/2/2022) (sxf)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #3 Complaint. The Court should dismiss this action without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/31/2022) (sxf)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/27/2022) (sxf)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 10/26/2022) (ygl)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chauncil-Danielle Williams. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mlb)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Verified Petition for Temporary Injunction filed by Chauncil-Danielle Williams. (mlb)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chauncil-Danielle Williams. (mlb)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Ben Adamcik, Dallas County, Garland Office, Bill Gipson, Vince Griffin, Mesquite Office filed by Chauncil-Danielle Williams. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mlb)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mlb)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Dallas County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chauncil-Danielle Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dallas County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mesquite Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garland Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vince Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Gipson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Adamcik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?