Munoz v. Red Oak Police Department
| Martin Munoz |
| Red Oak Police Department |
| 3:2022cv02411 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Martin Munoz re: #6 Judge's Questionnaire. (axm) |
Filing 6
Judge's Questionnaire sent to Martin Munoz. Responses due by 1/9/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/8/2022) (oyh)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Service of process shall be withheld pending further judicial screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and/or 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/8/2022) (oyh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: #5 . and Inmate Trust Fund Department. Thu Dec 8 15:54:07 CST 2022 (crt) Modified docket text on 12/8/2022 (oyh). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Dec 8 16:06:55 CST 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Oct 31 10:37:13 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Martin Munoz. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Red Oak Police Department filed by Martin Munoz. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Munoz v. Red Oak Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Martin Munoz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Red Oak Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
