Proxi Healthcare Staffing LLC v. Curative Talent LLC
Proxi Healthcare Staffing LLC doing business as Proxi Dental Staffing |
Curative Talent LLC |
3:2022cv02553 |
November 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Karen Gren Scholer |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Curative Talent LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kring, Jacob) |
Magistrate Judge David L. Horan assigned to this case pursuant to Special Order 3-346 for matters that may be referred. (cea) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Curative Talent LLC filed by Proxi Healthcare Staffing LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Waddell, Anthony) (Attachment 1 replaced to flatten on 12/8/2022) (sxf). |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Proxi Healthcare Staffing LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Waddell, Anthony) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Court construes the parties' #3 Joint Stipulation Regarding Deadlines as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint and motion for an extension and GRANTS it. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint on or before December 6, 2022, and Defendant shall file its answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before January 6, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 11/21/2022) (chmb) |
Filing 3 Joint STIPULATION Regarding Deadlines by Curative Talent LLC. (Kring, Jacob) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Curative Talent LLC. (Filing fee $402; receipt number BTXNDC-13297128) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Cover Sheet) (Kring, Jacob) (Attachment 4 replaced to flatten pdf on 11/14/2022) (mms). Modified on 11/14/2022 (mms). (Attachment 3 replaced to flatten pdf on 11/14/2022) (mms). |
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Curative Talent LLC.(See document #1 -3 for image) (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.