Multiquip Inc v. ANA Inc
Plaintiff: Multiquip Inc.
Defendant: ANA, Inc. and ANA Inc
Counter Defendant: Multiquip Inc
Case Number: 3:2022cv02599
Filed: November 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #17 Unopposed Motion to Extend Response Deadline. The deadline for Plaintiff to answer or otherwise respond to Defendant ANA, Inc.'s Counterclaims is 1/24/23. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/4/2023) (chmb)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to respond to counterclaims filed by Multiquip Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Richins, Travis)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #15 Unopposed Motion to Extend Scheduling Conference Deadlines. The deadline for the parties to confer under Rule 26(f) is extended to 1/18/2023, and the deadline to file a Joint Report is extended to 1/25/2023. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/3/2023) (chmb)
January 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time Deadline to conduct Rule 26(f) conference and file Joint Report filed by Multiquip Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Richins, Travis)
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 , #12 , #13 Applications for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Terence J. Linn, Karl T. Ondersma, and Matthew D. Kendall. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 12/29/2022) (chmb)
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Matthew D. Kendall (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13403891) filed by ANA Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Cone, John)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Karl T. Ondersma (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13396144) filed by ANA Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Cone, John)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Terence J. Linn (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-13396122) filed by ANA Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing) (Cone, John)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/11/2023. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 12/21/2022) (sxf)
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ANA Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cone, John) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/21/2022 to flatten pdf) (mlb).
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, with Jury Demand filed by ANA Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., COUNTERCLAIM against Multiquip Inc filed by ANA IncAttorney John Morant Cone added to party ANA Inc(pty:dft) (Cone, John)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge David L. Horan assigned to this case pursuant to Special Order 3-346 for matters that may be referred. (cea)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Multiquip Inc. (Richins, Travis)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Multiquip Inc. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Richins, Travis)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ANA Inc. (mla)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Multiquip Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Richins, Travis)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (sxf)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against ANA, Inc. filed by Multiquip Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13314208) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Patent, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Claim Chart, #3 Cover Sheet) (Richins, Travis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Multiquip Inc v. ANA Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Multiquip Inc.
Represented By: Travis Lee Richins
Represented By: Ryan S Loveless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANA Inc
Represented By: John Morant Cone
Represented By: Karl T Ondersma
Represented By: Kelly J Kubasta
Represented By: Matthew D Kendall
Represented By: Terence J Linn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Multiquip Inc
Represented By: James L Etheridge
Represented By: Ryan S Loveless
Represented By: Travis Lee Richins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?