Miller v. United States Government
| John Williams Miller |
| United States Government |
| 3:2022cv02694 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the plaintiff's #17 Motion to Remove Ramirez is DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/5/2023) (mcrd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:18. Thu Jan 5 11:51:59 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Remove Ramirez filed by John Williams Miller. (sxf)
|
|
Filing 16
Notice of Manual Filing: Thumb Drive of Direct Video Evidence of Criminal Felon(ies) "Covered up Hate Crimes Committed by FCSO Police on 7/23/2016 by the Evil Tribal Cabal" by John Williams Miller. (1 USB Drive filed under separate cover, see records department) (sxf) Modified text on 12/29/2022 (ykp).
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE filed by John Williams Miller re: #13 Memorandum Opinion and Order. (axm)
|
|
Filing 14
AFFIDAVIT of Residency by John Williams Miller. (axm)
|
|
Filing 13
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the plaintiff's Response[s] to [ECF No. 6], both filed 12/10/2022 (docs. #10 , #12 ), are liberally construed as motions to recuse and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/13/2022) (mcrd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:13. Tue Dec 13 08:16:50 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED RESPONSE filed by John Williams Miller re: #6 Order. (axm)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Summons as to Chad Meachum filed by John Williams Miller (2nd Set of Summons Accepted by Chad Meachum). (axm)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE filed by John Williams Miller re: #6 Order. (axm)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Summons as to Chad Meachum filed by John Williams Miller. (axm)
|
|
Filing 8
Proof of Service against United States of America filed by John Williams Miller. (axm)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons issued as to United States Government, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Because he paid the fee, the plaintiff is now responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint, the action is subject to dismissal against that defendant without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/6/2022) (mcrd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2022: #1 Additional Page(s) Rule 4, #2 Additional Page(s) Summons) (ndt).
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Dec 6 20:00:55 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Dec 6 09:46:27 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons issued as to United States Government, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (mlb)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2, 5. Mon Dec 5 10:38:18 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to United States Government. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against United States Government filed by John Williams Miller. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 300002602) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. United States Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Williams Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
