Vega et al v. Dallas County, Texas et al
Michael A. Vega and Dixie Vega |
Dallas County, Texas, Stefan Deshay Ross and Dallas County Texas |
3:2022cv02702 |
December 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ada Brown |
A Joe Fish |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Motion to Dismiss. Dallas County, Texas answer or motion to dismiss due 2/3/2023. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/3/2023) (axm) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time of deadline to file answer or motion to dismiss filed by Dallas County, Texas with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney J G Schuette added to party Dallas County, Texas(pty:dft) (Schuette, J) Modified on 1/3/2023 (axm). |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, #1 Complaint. It is ORDERED that the time for Defendant Stefan Deshay Ross to file his original answer and other responses is extended from 12/27/2022 to until 2/3/2023. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 12/28/2022) (ykp) |
Filing 8 Agreed MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer filed by Stefan Deshay Ross (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wiggins, Kevin) Modified event type on 12/28/2022 (ykp). |
Magistrate Judge David L. Horan assigned to this case pursuant to Special Order 3-346 for matters that may be referred. (cea) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Dallas County, Texas ; served on 12/13/2022. (Homyk, Kristen) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Stefan Deshay Ross ; served on 12/6/2022. (Homyk, Kristen) |
Filing 5 Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge A. Joe Fish recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Judge Ada Brown for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:22-cv-2702-E. (axm) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Dallas County, Texas, Stefan Deshay Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Dixie Vega, Michael A. Vega. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Request for issuance of summons) (Malone, T) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Michael A. Vega, Dixie Vega. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13343557) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Malone, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.