Dawkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Plaintiff: Jessie Dawkins
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2022cv02741
Filed: December 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Thu Dec 8 16:15:53 CST 2022 (crt)
December 7, 2022 Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mlb)
December 7, 2022 Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mlb)
December 7, 2022 Filing 6 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 5:22-cv-00112. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. Modified file date on 12/8/2022 (mlb).
December 7, 2022 Filing 5 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(DavidMorales, 5) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 12/8/2022.]
December 7, 2022 Transfer to the Norther District of Texas, Dallas Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 12/7/2022, filed. (DavidMorales, 5) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 12/8/2022.]
November 30, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DavidMorales, 5) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 12/8/2022.]
November 30, 2022 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jessie Dawkins, filed.(DavidMorales, 5) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 12/8/2022.]
November 30, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Jessie Dawkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DavidMorales, 5) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 12/8/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawkins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Dawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward L Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?