Wallis v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Clifford Wallis |
PHH Mortgage Corporation |
3:2022cv02773 |
December 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Brantley Starr |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by Clifford Wallis (Newark, Robert) |
Civil Case Terminated per #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (sxf) |
|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Petition filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Proposed Order)Attorney James Pearce Illmer added to party PHH Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft) (Illmer, James) Modified text on 12/21/2022 (sxf). |
Filing 6 Supplemental Document (Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) by PHH Mortgage Corporation as to #1 Notice of Removal. (Nunnallee, Adam) Modified text on 12/15/2022 (sxf). |
|
Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Nunnallee, Adam) |
Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Nunnallee, Adam) Modified text on 12/14/2022 (mms). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13369429) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index to Notice of Removal, EXs A, B and C) (Nunnallee, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wallis v. PHH Mortgage Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: PHH Mortgage Corporation | |
Represented By: | Adam Ross Nunnallee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Clifford Wallis | |
Represented By: | Robert C Newark, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.