Reed v. USA
| Phillip Reed |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv02785 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Order Regarding the Statute of Limitations filed by Phillip Reed re: #4 Order. (axm)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases. The Court will order Respondent to file an answer, if necessary, after screening is complete. It is therefore ORDERED that (1) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (2) all discovery in this case is stayed until Respondent is ordered to file an answer or until further order of the court, (3) no amendments or supplements to the 2255 motion shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (4) any motion to amend must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended 2255 motion on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Movant must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/15/2022) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Movant is ordered to file a response explaining why the 2255 motion is not barred by the one year statute of limitations. Show Cause Response is due by January 17, 2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/15/2022) (chmb)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. NEF of document 5 Thu Dec 15 23:45:24 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (axm)
|
|
Filing 1
ELECTRONIC ORDER: This case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on September 14, 2022. Doc. 5. On December 9, 2022, Defendant filed a new 2255 motion, styled Resubmission of Motion to Vacate Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Doc. 6. Because this case is closed, the Clerk of the Court is directed to STRIKE from the docket Doc. 6 and to FILE it as a new 2255 case. (Originally filed as document #7 in case 3:22-cv-1683) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/14/2022) (axm)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. NEF of document 1 Wed Dec 14 16:19:35 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (axm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:18-CR-194-B) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Originally filed as document #6 in case 3:22-cv-1683) (axm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Phillip Reed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
