Frank Surveying Co Inc v. Harp
| Frank Surveying Co Inc |
| M Dillon Harp |
| 3:2022cv02837 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re: #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Responses due by 12/28/2022. Replies due by 12/30/2022. The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff effectuate service of summons, the complaint, and Plaintiff's motion on Defendant by 12/21/2022. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/19/2022) (axm)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (axm)
|
|
Filing 2
Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by FRANK SURVEYING CO., INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Proposed Order) (Twomey, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against DILLON M HARP filed by FRANK SURVEYING CO., INC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13385335) Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Cover Sheet) (Twomey, Michael) (Attachments 7-8 replaced on 12/19/2022 to flatten pdfs) (axm).
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Frank Surveying Co Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (See document #1 -8 for image) (axm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frank Surveying Co Inc v. Harp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frank Surveying Co Inc | |
| Represented By: | Michael W Twomey |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Collin Delano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M Dillon Harp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
