R2 Solutions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc and 7-Eleven Inc
Counter Defendant: R2 Solutions LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv02868
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2023 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by 7-Eleven Inc. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (McNabnay, Neil)
February 17, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, with Jury Demand filed by 7-Eleven Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., COUNTERCLAIM against R2 Solutions LLC filed by 7-Eleven Inc (McNabnay, Neil)
February 17, 2023 Filing 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by 7-Eleven Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Proposed Order) (McNabnay, Neil)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that #9 Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, to and including February 18, 2023, is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 1/12/2023) (chmb)
January 11, 2023 Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by 7-Eleven Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Neil J McNabnay added to party 7-Eleven Inc(pty:dft) (McNabnay, Neil)
January 4, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to 7-Eleven Inc ; served on 12/29/2022. (Nelson, Edward)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Karen Gren Scholer for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/3/2023) (chmb)
December 22, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to 7-Eleven Inc. (mms)
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (mms) (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/22/2022) (mms).
December 21, 2022 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
December 21, 2022 Judge Ed Kinkeade added. Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater no longer assigned to case per Special Order 3-340. (axm)
December 21, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by R2 Solutions LLC. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Nelson, Edward)
December 21, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO 120) filed by R2 Solutions LLC (Nelson, Edward)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against 7-Eleven Inc filed by R2 Solutions LLC. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13392079) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, #3 Exhibit(s) 2, #4 Exhibit(s) 3, #5 Exhibit(s) 4, #6 Exhibit(s) 5, #7 Exhibit(s) 6, #8 Exhibit(s) 7, #9 Exhibit(s) 8, #10 Exhibit(s) 9, #11 Exhibit(s) 10) (Nelson, Edward) Modified text on 12/22/2022 (mms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R2 Solutions LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: R2 Solutions LLC
Represented By: Edward R Nelson, III
Represented By: Brent N Bumgardner
Represented By: Carder Wright Brooks
Represented By: Christopher Granaghan
Represented By: John Paul Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 7-Eleven Inc
Represented By: Nan Lan
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: David B Conrad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?