Pipkins v. Grand Prairie Police Department et al
| Joyce Pipkins |
| Grand Prairie Police Department, NFN Patterson and David Hunter |
| 3:2022cv02879 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
RESPONSE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Joyce Pipkins re: #10 Judge's Questionnaire. (acm)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Feb 13 15:35:51 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 10
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S QUESTIONNAIRE sent to Joyce Pipkins. Responses due by 2/27/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/30/2023) (sxf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Recuse. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/10/2023) (twd)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Jan 10 15:28:31 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Recuse filed by Joyce Pipkins. (axm)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Joyce Pipkins must address the following deficiency: Complaint is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 1/23/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 12/23/2022) (Attachments: #1 Rule 8, #2 1983 Complaint) (sxf)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of the Court SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS or take any further action pending judicial screening. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 12/23/2022) (ndt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Dec 23 10:35:34 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Dec 23 10:22:28 CST 2022 (crt)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joyce Pipkins. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mms)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joyce Pipkins. (mms)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Grand Prairie Police Department, David Hunter, NFN Patterson filed by Joyce Pipkins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mms)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (mms)
|
|
Filing 1
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Dec 22 15:41:49 CST 2022 (crt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
