Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Patrick Daniel Murphy |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
3:2022cv02887 |
December 22, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Rebecca Rutherford |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Hanna, Cara) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cara Blossom Hanna on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Hanna, Cara) |
Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Electronic Service from the Office of Attorney General of Texas. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer. (ykp) |
Filing 4 Notice of Electronic Service made on the Office of Attorney general of Texas re #2 New Case Notes, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer. (ndt) |
![]() |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Daniel Murphy. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $5; receipt number ATXNDC-13395964) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) (Smid, Matthew) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/23/2022) (mms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Patrick Daniel Murphy | |
Represented By: | William Reynolds Biggs |
Represented By: | Matthew Joseph Smid |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Represented By: | Cara Blossom Hanna |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.