Gorman v. Ethos Group Inc
Plaintiff: Nicholas Gorman
Defendant: Ethos Group, Inc. and Ethos Group Inc
Case Number: 3:2022cv02898
Filed: December 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Referring Judge: Barbara M G Lynn
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2023 Filing 13 STATUS REPORT Regarding Consolidation of the Related Cases filed by Nicholas Gorman. (Kendall, Joe)
February 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #11 Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is 3/16/2023. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/15/2023) (chmb)
February 14, 2023 Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by Ethos Group Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thomas, J)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: By 2/17/2023, Plaintiffs in Gorman and Harper shall file a status report in their respective cases, not to exceed ten pages, providing their respective positions as to whether the Related Cases should be consolidated. If the Court decides to consolidate the Related Cases, the Court will set a schedule for briefing regarding the appointment of lead Plaintiffs and liaison counsel. re: (15 in 3:22-cv-02573-M) MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Leadership. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/8/2023) (ykp)
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/6/2023) (chmb)
January 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER - Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages, Injunctive and Equitable Relief (the "Motion"). Doc. No. 7. Having considered the Motion, and finding good cause therefore, the Court GRANTS the Motion. The deadline for Defendant Ethos Group, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages, Injunctive, and Equitable Relief, Doc. No. 1, is hereby extended to February 16, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/20/2023) (chmb)
January 5, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Ethos Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney J Michael Thomas added to party Ethos Group Inc(pty:dft) (Thomas, J)
December 30, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ethos Group Inc; served on 12/27/2022. (axm)
December 27, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ethos Group Inc. (mms)
December 23, 2022 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mms)
December 23, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nicholas Gorman. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Kendall, Joe)
December 23, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons - Ethos Group Inc filed by Nicholas Gorman. (Kendall, Joe) Modified text on 12/27/2022 (mms).
December 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Ethos Group Inc filed by Nicholas Gorman. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13397823) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Kendall, Joe) Modified text on 12/27/2022 (mms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gorman v. Ethos Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Gorman
Represented By: Joe Kendall
Represented By: Gary M Klinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethos Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethos Group Inc
Represented By: J Michael Thomas
Represented By: Stephanie Lee McPhail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?