Hopkins v. Lew Sterrite Jail
| Jenna Hopkins |
| Lew Sterrite Jail, Officer Thomas and Officer Bibins |
| 3:2022cv03279 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Mail returned as undeliverable. #13 Findings and Recommendations received back from Jenna Hopkins as Return to Sender, No Such Number. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (ygl) |
Filing 13
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This action should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order and for lack of prosecution. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/28/2022) (mcrd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:13. Wed Sep 28 15:10:53 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 12 Mail returned as undeliverable. #11 Order to Sever, received back from Jenna Hopkins as no record by name. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (oyh) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Wed Aug 24 12:56:37 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Aug 23 10:03:24 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER Severing Claims and Notice of Deficiency and Order: It is therefore ORDERED: The complaint of Rodericka Davis will continue under this civil action no. 3:22-cv-1351-C-BK. The complaints of the remaining Plaintiffs are SEVERED into 30 individual civil rights lawsuits, one for each plaintiff. In each of the new civil actions, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file a copy of theAmended Complaint (Doc. 9) and this Order. Each new civil actions will be directly assigned to District Judge Cummings and Magistrate Judge Toliver per Special Order 3-250. Furthermore, each of the severed plaintiffs is ORDERED to file by 9/15/2022. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to each of the severed Plaintiffs, with service of this Order, a prisoner civil rights complaint form and a motion to proceed informa pauperis. (The following civil cases were opened on 8/23/2022: Aveena Jordan 3:22-cv-3255, Jennifer Laws 3:22-cv-3256, Terriz Burks 3:22-cv-3257, Rosa Hays 3:22-cv-3258, Alicia Rich 3:22-cv-3259, Nancy Jaramillo 3:22-cv-3260, Christan Mosy 3:22-cv-3261, Lesli James 3:22-cv-3262, Sulema Sierra 3:22-cv-3263, Letana Vaughn 3:22-cv-3264, Vanessa Martinez 3:22-cv-3265, Morena Joanna 3:22-cv-3266, Hailey Hamilton 3:22-cv-3267, Bianca Morales 3:22-cv-3268, Broke Browning 3:22-cv-3269, Briana McFinee 3:22-cv-3270, Rebecca Caldwell 3:22-cv-3271, Kenia Rubiovelasquez 3:22-cv-3272,Anabel Rarnirez 3:22-cv-3273, April Coterill 3:22-cv-3274, Robinson Tristan 3:22-cv-3275, Abigail Fonseca 3:22-cv-3276, Summer Price 3:22-cv-3277, Jasmine Limas 3:22-cv-3278, Jenna Hopkins 3:22-cv-3279, Molly Berry 3:22-cv-3280, Kavita Wan 3:22-cv-3281, Vicky Cleveland 3:22-cv-3282, Michelle Routh 3:22-cv-3283 and Jenese Henry 3:22-cv-3284.) (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/22/2022) (ykp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2022: #1 Complaint Form, #2 IFP Form) (jcc).
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rodericka Davis. (axm) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Officer Thomas, Officer Bibins filed by Rodericka Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (axm) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff Rodericka Davis must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff's June 10, 2022 letter request was not filed on the appropriate complaint form. Doc. #1 . Nor did Plaintiff pay filing and administrative fees of $402.00 or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified statement of the balance in his/her inmate trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2); N.D. Tex. Misc. Ord. 14 (requiring inmates to file civil rights complaints and motions to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved forms). Therefore, to the extent Plaintiff seeks to proceed with a new civil action, she is ORDERED to (1) file a complaint on the court-approved form and (2) pay the $402.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required certificate of inmate trust account, by August 9, 2022. See Complaint form at page 2, paragraph 3 for filing fee information under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. If Plaintiff did not intend to file a lawsuit at this time, she may file a Notice of Dismissal and the case will be closed without the assessment of a filing fee. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b).The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to Plaintiff, with service of this Order, a prisoner civil rights complaint form (labeled amended and reflecting this case number) and a prisoner motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Any amended complaint will supersede (take the place of) the previous filing. Consequently, Plaintiff must state all claims and list all defendants in any amended complaint filed. No process will issue except upon order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 7/11/2022) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Thu Jun 23 08:54:46 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sxf) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sxf) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: Order transferring case to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. Plaintiff complains about actions by Dallas County Jail employees, which allegedly happened in the Dallas County Jail. Dallas County lies in the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. Thus, in the interests of justice and judicial economy, the Court finds that Plaintiff's complaint should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/22/2022) (bmh)
|
| NEW CASE NUMBER 3:22-cv-01351-C Davis v. Lew Sterrite Jail has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 5:22cv0112-H. Future filings should reflect only the new case number and be directed to the proper division (see LR 5.1(a)). Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (ldm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Jun 22 11:06:38 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process will be withheld until judicial screening is complete, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel may be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until an answer is filed or until further order, (4) no amendments or supplements may be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 6/10/2022) (chmb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lew Sterrite Jail filed by Rodericka Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:. Mailed copy of NEF - Doc. No. 4 Fri Jun 10 10:44:59 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Fri Jun 10 09:28:51 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
