UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Studensky
Plaintiff: UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Defendant: James Studensky
Case Number: 3:2022mc00041
Filed: May 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Upon consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Quash and to Transfer to the Issuing Court, Doc. #1 , is GRANTED IN PART insofar as Defendant consents to the transfer of this case. Accordingly, this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 5/27/2022) (chmb)
May 27, 2022 Interdistrict Transfer to United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. Counsel advised to file future documents in United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. (mjr)
May 27, 2022 Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas as case number 20-06095-rbk. (mjr)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERENCE: This case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver for determination of the Motion to Quash #1 . (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 5/26/2022) (ygl)
May 26, 2022 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Case preliminarily assigned to Judge Toliver for items that may be referred. (mjr)
May 26, 2022 Case assigned to Judge David C Godbey per assignment in 3:22-xc-1139. Judge Karen Gren Scholer no longer assigned to the case. (rekc)
May 25, 2022 DISREGARD - ENTERED IN ERROR (rekc).
May 24, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Daniels, Timothy)
May 24, 2022 Filing 2 Appendix in Support filed by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company re #1 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena and Transfer to Issuing Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 thru 8 in Support of Motion) (Daniels, Timothy)
May 24, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena and Transfer to Issuing Court filed by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)Attorney Timothy A Daniels added to party UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company(pty:pla) (Daniels, Timothy) Terminated motion on 5/26/2022 (mjr).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company v. Studensky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Represented By: Timothy A Daniels
Represented By: Andrew G Jubinsky
Represented By: Jamie R Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Studensky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?