Tepp v. USA
| Steve Tepp |
| USA |
| 3:2023cv00115 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara M G Lynn |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Tepp shall either withdraw his 2255 motion or amend it using the enclosed form so that it contains all the claims he wishes to raise with respect to his federal conviction and/or sentence by 3/15/2023. The Clerks Office will send Tepp the standard form for filing a motion to vacate, set-aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 1/18/2023) (Attachments: #1 2255 Form) (sxf)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Jan 18 17:29:49 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1. Wed Jan 18 11:38:13 CST 2023 (crt)
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate doc. 157 on Tepp's criminal docket and open a new 2255 action. The Clerk of Court should open a new civil action under 2255 (nature of suit 510) with direct assignment to Judge Lynn and Magistrate Judge Rutherford. Doc. 157 should be filed in the new case. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/13/2023) (Document originally field in case 3:19-cr-605 as document number 159 ) (ndt) Modified docket text on 1/18/2023 (oyh).
|
|
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 3
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #2 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 by Petitioner Steve Tepp. (Document originally field in case 3:19-cr-605 as document number 158 ) (ndt) Modified docket text on 1/18/2023 (oyh).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 3:19-cr-605-M) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) (Document originally field in case 3:19-cr-605 as document number 157 ) Modified docket text on 1/18/2023 (oyh).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tepp v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steve Tepp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
